<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunlight dimmed; no one noticed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaystream.com/2009/04/01/sunlight-dimmed-no-one-noticed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaystream.com/2009/04/01/sunlight-dimmed-no-one-noticed/</link>
	<description>Common sense analysis of anything below the jet stream.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:05:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://jaystream.com/2009/04/01/sunlight-dimmed-no-one-noticed/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaystream.com/?p=799#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Good points. 
Last summer we visited the Space Weather Prediction Center in Boulder, and they were forecasting that sunspot activity would pick up soon. In early January, a couple sunspots occurred and NOAA declared that the next sunspot cycle was underway:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22508073/
That now appears a bit premature. 
Looks like forecasting astronomy and forecasting meteorology both have limitations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points.<br />
Last summer we visited the Space Weather Prediction Center in Boulder, and they were forecasting that sunspot activity would pick up soon. In early January, a couple sunspots occurred and NOAA declared that the next sunspot cycle was underway:<br />
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22508073/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22508073/</a><br />
That now appears a bit premature.<br />
Looks like forecasting astronomy and forecasting meteorology both have limitations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Ray</title>
		<link>http://jaystream.com/2009/04/01/sunlight-dimmed-no-one-noticed/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaystream.com/?p=799#comment-14</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s been a general dimming of the sun over the last 30 years believed to be from the increased presence in the atmosphere of particulate matter:

(http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sun/)

but an overall increase of solar radiation from the sun itself:
(http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/sun_output_030320.html)

How this has affected the global warming trend is rife with conflict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a general dimming of the sun over the last 30 years believed to be from the increased presence in the atmosphere of particulate matter:</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sun/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sun/</a>)</p>
<p>but an overall increase of solar radiation from the sun itself:<br />
(<a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/sun_output_030320.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/sun_output_030320.html</a>)</p>
<p>How this has affected the global warming trend is rife with conflict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

